We’re thrilled to announce that today’s Windows Insider build enables Service Workers by default in Microsoft Edge for the first time.
This is an exciting milestone for us and for the web! These new APIs allow the web to offer better experiences when devices are offline or have limited connectivity, and to send push notifications even when the page or browser isn’t open.
This milestone also establishes the foundation for full-featured Progressive Web App experiences in Microsoft Edge and the Microsoft Store. We’ve carefully tailored our implementation together with Windows and are excited to be the only browser on Windows 10 to provide push handling in the background to optimize for better battery usage. We’ll have more to share about PWAs on Windows in the weeks ahead, so be sure to stay tuned!
We believe Service Workers are a foundational new tool for the web with the potential to usher in a new golden age of web apps. You can try out web experiences powered by Service Workers in Microsoft Edge on starting with today’s Windows Insider release, 17063.
Before we walk through how Service Workers work, let’s start with some context on how the web has tried to handle offline capabilities before Service Workers came along.
The state of the web
Not too long ago, the web’s capabilities were lagging behind what native apps could do. Browser vendors, standards bodies, and the web community have relentlessly attacked this gap over the last decade, with the goal of enabling richer web experiences.
A particularly egregious sore spot for the web has always been how it handled—or failed to handle—the lack of an internet connection, or a poor-quality connection. Offline and the web never really went well together—in most cases, we were given a frustrating error page that only made it clearer that the web’s greatest asset was also its greatest weakness: the internet. In contrast, native apps are typically designed to provide a good experience even while offline or experiencing spotty service.
On top of that, native apps can re-engage their users with push notifications. On the web, after the browser or the app disappears, so does your ability to deliver relevant information or updates to your users.
In the rearview: Application Cache
By 2012, we were able to do offline on the web by introducing a new standard: Application Cache (or App Cache for short). Developers could list URLs for the browser to keep in a special cache called the App Cache, so that when users visited the page they would see something other than an infuriating error page.
Unfortunately, this wasn’t the silver bullet we were looking for in terms of bringing offline to the web. There are more than a few well-documented limitations for App Cache that made it confusing and error prone for many users and web developers. The sum of it all was that there was little control in how the App Cache would work since most of the logic occurred behind-the-scenes in the browser.
That meant if you ran into an issue, it would be exceedingly difficult to understand how to resolve it. There was an obvious need for something that gave greater control to developers by offering the capabilities of App Cache but made it more programmatic and dynamic while doing away with many of its limitations that made it difficult to debug.
Hit Rewind
App Cache left a lot to be desired. For the next swing at enabling offline scenarios, it was clear that browsers needed to provide web developers true control over what would happen when a page and its sub-resources were downloaded, rather than having it automatically and transparently handled in the browser.
With the ability to intercept network requests from a page and to prescribe what to do with each, site authors would be able to respond back to the page with a resource that it could use. Before we get there, it seems that we would need to revisit one of the most fundamental aspects of the web: fetching a resource.
How fetching!
As you may recall from my last post on Fetch, we now have the fetch() method as well as the Request and Response primitives. As a refresher, here’s how you might retrieve some JSON data using the fetch API:
Every request that happens on a page (including the initial navigation, CSS, images, scripts and XHR) is defined as a fetch. The fetch() method (as shown in the code sample) is just a way to explicitly initiate a fetch, while implicit fetches occur when loading a page and all of its sub-resources.
Since we’ve unified the concepts of fetching resources across the web platform, we can provide site authors the chance to define their own behavior via a centralized algorithm. So, how do we pass that control over to you?
Service worker: the worker that serves
Web workers have long been a great tool to offload intensive JavaScript to a separate execution context that doesn’t block the UI nor interaction with the page. Given the right conditions, we can repurpose the concept of a web worker to allow a developer to write logic in response to a fetch occurring on a page. This worker wouldn’t just be a web worker, though. It deserves a new name: Service worker.
A service worker, like a web worker, is written in a JavaScript file. In the script, you can define an event listener for the fetch event. This event is special, in that it gets fired every time the page makes a request for a resource. In the handler for the fetch event, a developer will have access to the actual Request being made.
You can choose to respond with a fetch for the provided Request using the JavaScript APIs which returns a Response back to the page. Doing this essentially follows the typical browser behavior for that request—it’s not intrinsically useful to just do a fetch for the request, ideally it would be more useful if we save previous Response objects for later.
Cache it!
The Cache API allows us to look up a specific Request and get its associated Response object. The APIs give access to a new underlying key/value storage mechanism, where the key is a Request object and the value is a Response object. The underlying caches are separate from the browser’s HTTP cache and are origin-bound (meaning that they are isolated based on scheme://hostname:port) so that you cannot access caches outside of your origin. Each origin can define multiple different caches with different names. The APIs allow you asynchronously open and manipulate the caches by making use of Promises:
These caches are completely managed by the developer, including updating the entries and purging them when they’re no longer needed – this allows you to rely on what will be there when you may not necessarily be connected to the internet.
Although the Caches API is defined as part of the Service Worker spec, it can also be accessed from the main page.
So now you have two asynchronous storage APIs to choose from: Indexed DB and the Caches API. In general, if what you’re trying to store is URL-addressable, use the Caches API; for everything else, use Indexed DB.
Now that we have a way to save those Response objects for later use, we’re in business!
Back to the worker
With a service worker, we can intercept the request and respond from cache. This gives us the ability to improve page load performance and reliability, as well as to offer an offline experience. You can choose to let the fetch go through to the internet as is, or to get something from the cache using the Cache API.
The first step to using a service worker is to register it on the page. You can do this by first feature-detecting and then calling the necessary APIs:
As part of the registration, you’ll need to specify the location of the service worker script file and define the scope. The scope is used to define the range of URLs that you want the service worker to control. After a service worker is registered, the browser will keep track of the service worker and the scope it is registered to.
Upon navigating to a page, the browser will check if a service worker is registered for that page based on the scope. If so, the page will go on to use that service worker until it is navigated away or closed. In such a case, the page is said to be controlled by that service worker. Otherwise, the page will instead use the network as usual, and will not be controlled by a service worker.
Upon registration, the service worker won’t control the page that registered it. It will take control if you refresh the page or you open a new page that’s within its scope.
After initiating the registration of a service worker, it will go through the registration process. That will involve going through the different phases of its lifecycle.
The service worker lifecycle
Let’s unpack the different phases of the service worker’s lifecycle, starting with what happens once you try to register it.
Installing
This is the first step that any service worker goes through. After the JavaScript file has been downloaded and parsed by the browser, it will run the install event of your script. That’s when you’ll want to get everything ready such as priming your caches.
In the following example, the oninstall event handler in the service worker will create a cache called “static-v1” and add all the static resources of the page to the cache for later use by the fetch handler.
Installed
Once the service worker is installed, the setup is complete, and the service worker is awaiting all pages/iframes (clients) that are controlled by this service worker registration to be closed so that it can be activated. It could be potentially problematic to change the service worker for pages that are still actively using a previous version of the service worker, so the browser will instead wait until they’ve been navigated away or closed.
Activating
Once no clients are controlled by the service worker registration (or if you called the skipWaiting API), the service worker goes to the activating phase. This will run the activate event in the service worker which will give you the opportunity to clean up after the previous workers that may have left things behind, such as stale caches.
In this example, the onactivate event handler in the service worker will remove all caches that are not named “static-v1.”
Activated
Once it’s been activated, the service worker can now handle fetch and other events as well!
In this example, the onfetch event handler in the service worker will respond back to the page with a match from the cache if it exists and if there isn’t an entry in the cache, it will defer to making a fetch to the internet instead. If that fetch fails, it will resort to returning a fallback.
Redundant
The final phase of the service worker is when it is being replaced by another service worker because there’s a new one available that is going to take its place.
There’s more to it: the big picture
So far, we’ve explored the following service worker events: install, activate, and fetch. Install and activate are considered lifetime events while fetch is considered a functional event. What if we could expand on the service worker’s programming model and introduce other functional events that could plug in to it? Given that service workers are event-driven and are not tied down to the lifetime of a page, we could add other events such as push and notificationclick which would present the necessary APIs to enable push notifications on the web.
Push it to the limit
Push notifications provide a mechanism for developers to inform their users in a timely, power-efficient and dependable way, that re-engages them with customized and relevant content. Compared to current web notifications, a push notification can be delivered to a user without needing the browser/app or page to be opened.
The W3C Push API and Notification API go hand-in-hand to enable push notifications in modern browsers. The Push API is used to set up a push subscription and is invoked when a message is pushed to the corresponding service worker. The service worker then is responsible for showing a notification to the user using the Notification API and reacting to user interaction with the notification.
A standardized method of message delivery is also important for the W3C Push API to work consistently across all major browsers where application servers will need to use multiple push services. For instance, Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox use Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) and Mozilla Cloud Services (MCS), respectively while Microsoft Edge relies on the Windows Push Notification Service (WNS) to deliver push messages.
To reach reasonable interoperability with other browsers’ messaging services, WNS has now deployed support for the Web Push protocols being finalized within IETF, as well as the Message Encryption spec and the Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) spec for web push. Web developers can now use the Web Push APIs and service workers to provide an interoperable push service on the web.
To start, you’ll first need to make sure your web server is setup to send pushes. The Web-Push open-source library is a great reference for anyone new to web push. The contributors have done a reasonable job in keeping up with the IETF specs. After starting up a node.js server based on the web-push library, you’ll need to setup the VAPID keys. Keep in mind that you’ll need to use HTTPS as it is required for service workers and push. You only need to set up the VAPID keys once which can be generated easily using the corresponding function in the web-push library.
Once that’s all sorted out, it’s time to take advantage of push in your site or app. Once the page loads, the first thing you’ll want to do is get the public key from the application server so that you can set up the push subscription.
With the public key in hand, as before, we’ll need to install the service worker, but this time, we’ll also create a push subscription.
Before a new push subscription is created, Microsoft Edge will check whether a user granted permission to receive notifications. If not, the user will be prompted by the browser for permission. You can read more about permission management in an earlier post about Web Notifications in Microsoft Edge. From a user’s perspective, notifications from the page or from a push service appear identical, so we are using the same permission for both types of notifications.
To create a push subscription, you’ll need to set the userVisibleOnly option to “true” – meaning a notification must be shown as a result of a push – and provide a valid applicationServerKey. If there is already a push subscription, there is no need to subscribe again.
At any point when a push is received by the client, a corresponding service worker is run to handle the event. As part of this push handling, a notification must be shown so that the user understands that something is potentially happening in the background.
Of course, after a notification is shown, there is still the matter of dealing with when its been clicked. As such, we need to have another event listener in the service worker that would handle this case.
In this case, we first dismiss the notification and then we can choose to open a window to the intended destination. You’re also able to sort through the already open windows and focus one of those, or perhaps even navigate an existing window.
Push: The Next Generation
As part of our ongoing commitment to expanding the possibilities of the web, Microsoft Edge and PWAs in Windows will handle these service worker push event handlers in the background—there’s no need for Microsoft Edge or your PWA to be running for the push to be handled. That’s because we’ve integrated with Windows to allow for a more holistic approach to push notifications.
By leveraging Windows’ time-tested process lifetime management, we’re able to offer a system that reacts appropriately to system pressures such as low battery or high CPU and memory usage. For users, that means better resource management and battery life expectations. For developers, it means a push event handler that will get to run to completion, without interruption from user actions such as closing the browser window or app. Note that a service worker instance that is running in the foreground for the fetch event will not be the same as the one in the background handling the push event.
Notifications in Microsoft Edge and PWAs will be integrated in the Windows Action Center. If a user receives a notification and didn’t get the chance to act on it, it will get tucked away into Action Center for later, so notifications never get left unseen. Action Center will also group multiple notifications coming from the same domain, so that users have an easier time sorting through them.
Service worker: properties
I’d like to take a moment to go over some things you should keep in mind when using service workers in your web app or site. In no particular order, here they are:
- HTTPS-only. Service workers will not work in HTTP; you will need to use HTTPS. Fortunately, if you’re testing locally, you’re allowed to register service workers on localhost.
- No DOM access is allowed. As with web workers, you don’t get access to the page’s object model. This means that if you need to change something about the page, you’ll need to use postMessage from the service worker to the page so that you can handle it DOM changes from the page.
- Executes separate from page. Because these scripts are not tied to the lifetime of a page, it’s important to understand that they do not share the same context as the page. Aside from not having access to the DOM (as stated earlier), they won’t have access to the same variables available on the page.
- Trumps App Cache. Service workers and App Cache don’t play well together. App Cache will be ignored when service workers are in use. Service workers were meant to give more control to the web developer—imagine if you had to deal with the magic of App Cache while you’re trying to step through the logic of your service worker!
- Script can’t be on CDN. The JavaScript file for the service worker can’t be hosted on a Content Distribution Network (CDN), it must be on the same domain as the page. However, if you like, you can import scripts from your CDN.
- Can be terminated any time. Remember that service workers are meant to be short-lived and their lifetime is tied to events. In particular, service workers have a time limit in which they must finish executing their event handlers. In other cases, the browser or the operating system may choose to terminate a service worker that impacts the battery, CPU, or memory consumption. In either case, it would be prudent to not rely on global variables in the service worker in case a different service worker instance is used on a subsequent event that’s being handled.
- Only asynchronous requests allowed. Synchronous XHR is not allowed here! Neither is localStorage, so it’s best to make use of Indexed DB and the new Caches API described earlier.
- Service worker to scope is 1:1. You’ll only be able to have one service worker per scope. That means if you try to register a different service worker for a scope that already has a service worker, that service worker will be updated.
Recap
Service workers are so much more than an HTTP proxy! They are the foundation of a web app model that enables event-driven JavaScript to run, independent of web pages. Service workers were brought in to the web platform as a necessity to enable offline use cases, but it’s clear that they can do so much more, as we continue to extend their capabilities to other scenarios. Today we have push, but in the future, there will be other exciting capabilities that will bring the web that much closer to offering the captivating and reliable experiences we’ve always wanted.
Go put a worker to work!
So, what are you waiting for? You can get started testing service workers in Microsoft Edge today by installing the Windows Insider Preview build 17063 or higher. We’d love to hear your feedback, so please share any bugs you encounter or reach out to us on Twitter to get in touch!
— Ali Alabbas, Program Manager, Microsoft Edge
— Jatinder Mann, Program Manager, Microsoft Edge
The post Service Workers: Going beyond the page appeared first on Microsoft Edge Dev Blog.